Notes On the Subject of the Dishonest Steward

- Two elements I wish to talk about. The parable, and the verses that refer to the mammon of unrighteousness.
- Parable: Not understood because interpreters are distracted by the title that was never part of the text. The parable is not about the dishonest Steward but the Businessman who had a steward. Rule #1 When reading a parable Jesus tells you who or what the parable is about in the opening phrase. “A man had two sons,” A sower went forth to sow”. In this case, there was a rich man who had a steward. It’s about the rich man. This misdirection has caused havoc over the centuries. This parable was one of the references the Emperor Julian used to repudiate Christianity and turn back to the old Roman Gods.
- Context of the parable. We are told in 15:1 Jesus was talking to a bunch of Tax Collectors and Sinners; present were some Pharisees and Jesus’ disciples. Tax collectors were very wealthy, and the sinners here referred to would be other businessmen, – entrepreneurs, speculators and wheeler-dealers. This class of people has always been shunned by religious people as second class spiritual citizens. They were the very opposite to the Pharisees that lived by law and regulations. The wheeler dealing attitude of businesspeople was by contrast highly creative and lived on the boundaries of what was prescribed. It was one of these people Jesus was referring to as having a steward.
- The rich man heard his steward had been allowing a serious cash flow crisis to develop in the business and permitting accounts receivable to get out of hand. This is indicated in the Greek word diascorpidzo, which means scatter. LXX use to describe winnowing, Israel scattered among nations or scattering seed. Gospel of Luke: In the preceding parable, the Prodigal Son scatters his cash and “when in need, no one gave him anything”.
- The steward’s response is to use his position to curry favor with one of the debtors, who would surely take the deal offered, but wouldn’t offer the guy a job. The Steward is painted as weak, unrealistic and out of touch with reality.
- Business owner undertakes the audit. He would check the stock, count the cash, and examine the ledger or written account. “He saw what the steward had done and congratulated him. He thought he was looking at a classic response to a cash flow crisis.
- Why? Because any business-person faced with a raft of uncollectable debts or notes would do just what the steward had done and make deals with the debtors for cash. He would discount notes receivable and get what he could so business could go on. The steward had done the right deed for the wrong reason. LOL
The point of the story is that God is like an entrepreneur, he is more interested in getting on with business (Life) than collecting every little bit that is owed. God is not interested in our sins but says deal with it, get over it and now what new life can we bring about together? That is antithetical to the Pharisees point of view and very much at variance with the religious teaching of the church down the centuries. Every little sin has to be accounted for and punished or confessed and forgiven. What is more, the church has developed control over that process, determining who is forgiven or who is not. This control has been used to create a church income stream at times.
This is the second reason why the church cannot afford to understand this parable. God is like a businessman who is only interested in the next deal and takes what is possible and uses that capital to launch new deals.
Now to tackle the last enigma. Make friends with the Mammon of Unrighteousness. Meaning has only been figured out recently. My attention was directed to a couple of references in the Dead Sea Scrolls. In the Rule of the Community a man who seeks to become a member of the community has to give up all contact with the outside world and have nothing to do with the mammon of unrighteousness or anyone outside the community. The inference is everyone outside the community is contaminated by the mammon of unrighteousness. You cannot work for or have any financial dealing of the simplest kind with anyone outside the community. Meanwhile everything you have is taken into the community and held for a year whilst you are investigated for purity and morality. After the second year you are accepted as a member, allowed to participate in the sacred meal and your possessions taken as part of the community’s possessions.
In other words, the Essenes were forbidden to mix with outsiders all of whom were regarded as the unrighteous and all their dealings were the mammon of unrighteousness. What Jesus is saying here is, “Don’t be like the Essenes refusing to deal with anyone else, but get to know these people, learn from them for they know human nature better than you do. Make friends with them and be prepared to learn from them.
How this might be relevant today.
This is of great consequence today, for we in the church need to learn from what is being discovered, developed and created in the world about us. We cannot withdraw or deride this present culture or the world’s new face. We need to join the party and not disparage the lives and efforts of others. We have something to contribute to our society that is of great importance, but we will do so only if we can first be in relationship with them.